All is well in the sunny United Kingdom. I have been getting fitter more recently. Over the years you produced good powerpoint presentations supporting your public appearances, your video programs are explained very well, edited well with your monologues. The science itself, when explained purely scientifically, can be produced and shared with other scientists around the world, in a short form format. To this date what is needed is a video of the actual chemical reaction. Hydrogen cyanide (HCN) actually turns moist new brickwork of the same class into the prussian blue residue. This is what the viewer will see with their eyes and ears in a video demonstration. Something to show the actual process happening. Perhaps a "go fund me", where the components are itemised. If a go fund me was set up, this can be shared in our many groups to fund a small controlled video demonstration. A large glass cabinet, air tight to a solid table safety protocol the Zyklon B type used moist red bricks filmed in good lighting a time lapse frame of the event using a Go Pro Camera. (Time Lapse Photo, adjust your interval and resolution setting) The microscope that can image the findings of the Fe4[Fe(CN)6]3 Perhaps using your video editing, showing the chemical formulae (Stoichiometry : Law of Conservation of Mass) for scientists and the wider public to understand in a simple format. This could be shared easily online just to show the chemical reaction happening. The scientific video would be blocked or banned. At best this could go viral on sharing platforms, social media, and be sent directly in links to qualified academics. The most spoken languages worldwide by total speakers are English, Mandarin Chinese, Spanish, Portuguese and Hindi for translation. The most optimistic result we could all hope for is to trigger an investigation. Germar, you will have heard of Richard Gage the American architect who founded Architects and Engineers for the collapse of the buildings on 9/11. Quite a lot of scientific investigation happened. You may have seen : forensic detectives discovered nano-thermite at the site cited in the peer-reviewed paper "Active Thermitic Materials in the WTC Dust" article published in 2009 in the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal. Professor Steven Earl Jones discovered Nano-thermite (a high tech explosive) in samples taken, plus 100ft (2.25 seconds) of free fall (i.e no physical resistance) which is the biggest evidence that the mainstream media and some government officials will not debate in a civilised public debate FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, did publish the Limited Metallurgical Examination from WTC 7. The Commision report completely ignored the psyops, but NIST later confirmed free fall, but refused to investigate further Professor David Chandler used video frame tracking software (Physics Tool Kit, Open Source Software Tracer, Frame Tracking, pixel calibration), that he used in his physics teaching, to measure various velocities and accelerations which demonstrated the absolute freefall for 2.25 seconds of the North West Corner of World Trade Center Building 7, proving that NIST's claims about that building were false. Professor David Chandler's work forced NIST to correct their final report to admit that the WTC7 symmetrical collapse in freefall occured, even though they continue to deny its clear implications of pre planned demolition where 8 stories (floors) or 32.0 metres (105 feet) of building disappeared with zero resistance Dr. Leroy Hulsey warranted further investigation based on group PhD study into progressive collapse, structural evidence (610 feet tall, 330 feet long, 140 feet wide, 350 feet away, south side, from the nearest WTC1), AUTOCAD, SAP2000, ABAQUS, could not collapse by fire (no combustibility based on steel structure beams), the intact penthouse being first to fall, UAF architecture models of the 44 feet beams of thermal expansion directly oppose stress report which NIST did not include huge added resistance on the free fall evidence. Germar, this scientific follow up is what is morally needed, we need lectures in universities to go over this. The science alone will take the taboo nature of revisionism then denial out of the blocked mindset. There is a herd mentality to validate the perception of reality. This really needs to be visually demonstrated if they lack curiosity, confirm pattern recognition in the science, remove negative emotion, standardise the science. The National Institute of Standards and Technology responded to calls from congress and the public to carry out a federal investigation of why the buildings collapsed. I really feel a video, showing the chemical reaction, with a simple form of the science clearly demonstrated. One day in the future a political leader could be the person who initiates a public enquiry. If Architects and Engineers https://www.ae911truth.org/ show at the near bottom of the webpage as of today : 3,661 Architects and Engineers 35,971 Members of the Public If this can be applied to just the simple chemical reaction, sticking only to the science, a polling of the exact same process can be the proof that moves this topic to the next stage, which is political recognition. If you want to do this, I really want to help in any way. The funding can be arranged by sharing a go fund me.